Our Director, Mohammed Zeb, successfully represented a female youth charged with Section 20 Grievous Bodily Harm. Despite the prosecution's vigorous attempts to establish "dangerousness" and advocate for a prison sentence, Mr. Zeb effectively dismantled their arguments. His exceptional intervention resulted in the client receiving only a referral order and fine, a significantly more favourable outcome.
Stuart Miller Solicitors
Law Practice
🔹Fraud | Tax | Cyber | Drugs | Firearms ⚖️ False Allegations of Violence & Sexual Offences
About us
Stuart Miller Solicitors have been able to exceed their goal of gaining a high reputation among others in the field, an achievement made possible by the high calibre of employees within the company. While dealing with high profile cases, Stuart Miller Solicitors has become a rewarding company to work for. There is a dedicated team to deal with all areas of law, specialising in Fraud, Cyber Crime and Criminal Defence. Offices are located in London, with a client base worldwide. Talented, passionate and experienced Solicitors lead a team with a common goal of securing the very best outcome for the client. There is a wealth of knowledge between the professional at the firm on all levels, all on hand to share and contribute to a case when needed. On hand to provide legal advice, including funding options. In what may seem like a hopeless situation, Stuart Miller Solicitors are able to unlock an energetic attitude and inject substantial knowledge to secure the potential of success. Each client is offered a personalised service, including 24/7 contact via a WhatsApp groups with their defence team. We have verified our expertise to handle complex cases and are listed amongst the elite, on the Serious Fraud Panel. We are Regulated & Authorised by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and are one of a small number of firms in the country standing proud of being 'Highly Commended' by the Law Society for excellence in Management. We are contracted with the Legal Aid Agency as well as being a Lexcel Accredited firm. Evidently, we have earned our reputation and have the 'stars and medals' to prove our high standing achievements. To find out more about Stuart Miller Solicitors visit our page: https://www.stuartmillersolicitors.co.uk
- Website
-
http://www.stuartmillersolicitors.co.uk
External link for Stuart Miller Solicitors
- Industry
- Law Practice
- Company size
- 11-50 employees
- Headquarters
- London
- Type
- Public Company
- Founded
- 1984
- Specialties
- Fraud Law, Cybercrime (Computer & Internet Crime), Confiscation & Restraint Orders, Criminal Defence, and Criminal Law
Locations
-
Primary
247 High Road
Wood Green
London, N22 8HF, GB
Employees at Stuart Miller Solicitors
Updates
-
In a fantastic win, our caseworker Ella Burt teamed with Rishy Pansear from Furnival Chambers, achieved a remarkable outcome for a case involving ABH and Theft. The client received a lenient 12-month conditional discharge. However, the true triumph came when the judge, recognised the public interest and decided against prosecuting our client for ABH. This pivotal decision granted our client freedom that day and marked a victorious end.
-
Our senior caseworker, Peter Yirimambo, supported by Joel Reynolds from Furnival Chambers, showcased relentless preparation. Despite the prosecution's initial stance, their case collapsed, unable to produce evidence for strangulation and common assault. It was a testament to our team's dedication and strategic prowess, securing a resounding victory for our client.
-
Our caseworker Ella Burt, with assistance from Kane S. of Furnival Chambers, effectively challenged the admissibility of the complainant's evidence under res gestae, leading to a significant victory at Wood Green Crown Court. Despite severe allegations including intentional strangulation and ABH, the Crown withdrew all charges after reviewing our compelling representations.
-
Our caseworker Ella Burt with the help of Kane Sharpe from Furnival Chambers wrote compelling representations to the Crown Prosecution Service arguing that the complainant’s allegation and evidence could not be adduced under res gestate. Despite daunting allegations of intentional strangulation, suffocation, and ABH, the outcome at Wood Green Crown Court was a triumph. The Crown offered no evidence on all counts after careful consideration of our representations.
-
We are excited to announce our participation in this year's London #LegalWalk on June 18th to help raise funds for the London Legal Support Trust (@londonlegal), which aims to ensure access to justice for all. Over the past 20 years, the Legal Walk has raised 10.5 million for free legal advice agencies. If you would like to support our team, please visit our fundraising page at https://lnkd.in/ePQ54MS3
-
In a remarkable display of legal skill, our Trainee Solicitor, Sophie Lalaoui, supported by Shannon Revel from Furnival Chambers, scrutinised the prosecution's DNA evidence. They uncovered critical inconsistencies that led to the collapse of their case. As a result, our client was cleared of charges of violent disorder and possession of a bladed article.
-
Our Trainee Solicitor, Savannah Loizides, with the support of Helen Douglass-Dixon from Rose Court Chambers triumphed when the prosecution discontinued the case despite the prosecution's assertion of possessing forensic and fingerprint evidence. Our client was freed of 3 counts of Burglary.
-
Our client was facing 7 serious allegations of robbery. Our senior caseworker, Peter Yirimambo paired with Trevor Siddle from Furnival Chambers made compelling written representations to the Crown Prosecution Service. As a testament to the strength of our case, the prosecution offered no evidence on the day of the trial. Consequently, our client was exonerated of all allegations, marking a resounding success for our legal team.
-
Our Trainee Solicitor, Savannah Loizides, along with Lily Roberts-Phelps from Furnival Chambers, skillfully contested the prosecution's case, leading to a favorable outcome for our client. As a result, our client was absolved of serious allegations of conspiracy to supply class A and B drugs and conspiracy to acquire criminal property. The prosecution ultimately accepted a reduced charge of possession of class B only.